Behind the hot-selling mask TOTOBOBO best-selling

China Consumers Association released 37 comparative test results of protective performance of mask products. According to the report, among the 37 samples, only 9 samples were found to have good anti-mite effect and smooth breathing, accounting for only 24.3% of the total sample. Even more eye-popping is that a 199 yuan mask filter effect and a one-dollar mask like. The "TOTOBOBO" changeable filter cotton type rubber mask was popular in the article "Is it a Fight or Flicker?" there is only one truth! 8 common

"Flood prevention" mask evaluation, was strongly recommended by the author "fog and haze survival manual" team. This shocking contrast can not help but think deeply about what the “experts” in the eyes of consumers have.

According to the experimental results published by China Consumers Association, the protective effect of the trial is divided into five levels, with a maximum of five stars. The “TOTOBOBO” filterable cotton-type rubber mask with a price of 199 yuan is sold at a price of only 1 yuan. Baowei Kang POWECOM" dust mask (disposable mask), the same filtering effect, only for Samsung half. However, in terms of breathing resistance, the $199 mask was not as comfortable as a one-dollar product. The evaluation results of the “Smog Survival Manual” on the TOTOBOBO masks show that the perfect fit of the face does not leak, and the filter element has a 96% filtering effect on PM0.3, and the color change of the filter element can visually reveal the air pollution.

There are many network evaluations, only professional organizations can detect the truth

The Consumers Association's mask comparison test was commissioned by the National Labor Insurance Products Quality Supervision and Inspection Center (Beijing) to refer to the test method for the relevant performance of the GB2626-2006 "Respiratory protective equipment self-absorbing filter type particulate respirator" and to filter the sample masks. Comparison of protective performance with respect to effects, respiratory resistance, leakage, etc. The evaluation of the “Mist Survival Handbook” clearly stated in the article that it was an evaluation of the product's materials, design rationality, and feelings of use. It did not involve data testing, and stated that its selected evaluation indicators were adequately identified. The mask is "positive." As a result, public credibility is weak and weak and there is no need to repeat it.

Imported goods must be tagged in Chinese, and the "three-nothing" price mask is profitable.

But how to put aside the protective effect, TOTOBOBO has long been pointed out that there is no Chinese label on the package and it belongs to “pseudo-importation of three non-products”. But in spite of this, it cannot stop its sales volume soaring after the recommendation of the “Smog Survival Manual”. From the Taobao index, after TOTOBOBO was recommended by the handbook, 40 people from the beginning of the 13th quickly became TOP10. The domestic brands criticized by the manual have all been affected to varying degrees. In contrast, consumers' interests are even more impaired. It is not just the loss of 199 yuan to buy an invalid product, but also the incalculable health loss caused by the ineffective protection of such a product. However, are the beneficiaries really just TOTOBOBO manufacturers?

Vigilance of public welfare organizations in disguise to sell astronomical masks

A self-proclaimed "public welfare" WeChat public account, but it is a mask without endorsement, illegal imports and expensive endorsement, it is puzzling, I am afraid "to benefit from" can give its best explanation. There has been a long tradition that “The account of the 'Smog Survival Manual' has started to cooperate directly and indirectly with TOTOBOBO from the day of birth”. Although there is no definite proof, it is conjectured about the “interest exchange” behind the strong recommendation. The estimate is not groundless.

The masses who did not understand the truth were surrounded by their overwhelming promotion. They were bewildered by the “eloquent debate” ignoring the facts. They were regarded as experts on flood prevention, and they put their hearts on the ground to talk about demands and recommendations. They were completely blinded, and even authoritative media were deceived by them. . CCTV celebrity host Sa Bening recently conducted an exclusive interview with the “Smoke Survival Handbook” and publicly wore TOTOBOBO masks with poor protection in the program. Under the circumstances of unclear circumstances, it boosted the “smoke”. The Survival Manual's propaganda recommendation for TOTOBOBO misled consumers about the choice of haze protection products.

After the China Consumers Association released the data of the mask comparison test, many fans of the “Smoke Survival Handbook” questioned the recommendation of the TOTOBOBO masks. They just understated the phrase “the recent appearance of a large wave of black TOTOBOBO articles”, and Still loyal to TOTOBOBO, its protective effect is greatly appreciated, saying that it believes in Singapore's products. What is the effect of PM2.5 protective products? It cannot be judged by personal experience, information on the official website of the product, or place of production, and it should be allowed to speak with data facts. Faced with such recommendations as the "Smog Survival Handbook," consumers need to be cautious.

This website solemnly declares: This article is the reprint of the online media, only represents the author's point of view, has nothing to do with this site. If news articles and comments infringe your legal rights, please call us and we will handle it in a timely manner.