There are several misunderstandings in the use of personal protective equipment by business managers and workers

Myth #1: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is optional
Experts emphasize that personal protective equipment plays a crucial role in reducing the risks of occupational diseases. According to the Occupational Disease Prevention Act, employers are legally required to provide workers with PPE that meets safety standards, and employees must use it as instructed. Ignoring this requirement can lead to serious health consequences. Misunderstanding #2: No smell means no need for PPE
Many harmful substances, such as certain gases and chemicals, are odorless and colorless, making them difficult to detect without proper equipment. Relying solely on sensory perception can be dangerous, as individual sensitivity varies. This can result in unnoticed exposure and potential poisoning. Myth #3: Gauze masks protect against dust
Ordinary gauze masks are not suitable for dust protection. They are designed for comfort, not safety. Even when layered, they cannot effectively filter out fine particles that cause lung diseases like pneumoconiosis. Specialized respirators are necessary for real protection. Myth #4: Medical masks protect against chemicals
While medical masks help prevent the spread of germs through droplets, they are not effective against toxic gases. Different chemicals require specific types of respirators—such as those with activated carbon filters for volatile organic compounds. Myth #5: Dust masks can be washed and reused
Reusing or washing dust masks is not recommended. The high-efficiency filters in these masks are often made of non-woven materials that rely on electrostatic charges to trap particles. Washing damages the structure, reduces effectiveness, and increases health risks.

Personal protective equipment is an essential but not sufficient measure. Employers should prioritize advanced production technologies and engineering controls to minimize hazards. PPE should only be used when other protective measures are not enough. It's important to remember that no single piece of equipment can offer complete protection—it must be chosen based on the specific work environment and hazards involved. In workplaces where hazardous substances are present, inadequate protection can lead to severe health issues. For example, exposure to white hexane in electronics manufacturing may cause nerve damage, while benzene-containing solvents in shoe and printing industries can harm the blood system, leading to conditions like leukemia. Trichloroethylene in degreasing processes can cause skin damage, and silica dust from construction or mining can lead to silicosis. Other risks include heat stress for sanitation workers, noise and fumes for drivers, and electromagnetic radiation for office staff. Mental health is also affected by occupational hazards. Cleanroom workers, for instance, may experience anxiety, depression, or paranoia due to high-pressure environments. As awareness of occupational health grows, it’s vital for both employers and governments to invest in safer working conditions and enforce strict regulations. Only through collective effort can we reduce the impact of occupational diseases and create a healthier, more sustainable future for all workers.

This website solemnly declares: This article is a reprint from online media, and the views expressed are solely those of the author. It has no relation to this site. If any content infringes upon your legal rights, please contact us immediately, and we will handle it promptly.